Subjects
Around three groups of Edging collies (GWL pet, kissbrides.com i thought about this Hungarian pets, Austrian pets), all older than ten days old, were included in this studies. age., an arbitrary attempt has been chosen throughout the HU and you will Au pets to match the brand new descriptives of one’s Grams pet).
Every animals included in the GWL pets category knew new identity out of 10 > toys (Binomial decide to try, p 2 ). Whenever a difference are included in confirmed grounds, i focus on most analyses toward aspects of one grounds, and you will Games–Howell post-hoc testing (Industry 2013) was in fact focus on in which high variations have been located. I used Cohen’s d so you’re able to guess the end result dimensions for these pairwise contrasting. To handle with the not the case finding rates (FDR), we made use of Benjamini–Hochberg procedure (Benjamini and you will Hochberg 1995) to adjust the p thinking for several reviews. SPSS (type 28, IBM Agency) was used for all statistical analyses with the exception of Cohen’s d and therefore are calculated yourself.
Results
Descriptives of the means and standard deviations of the three dog groups can be found in Table 1. Fearfulness, Aggression towards People, and Aggression towards Animals did not differ significantly between the three samples of Border collies (p > 0.184 for all). However, we found a significant difference between the samples in Activity/Excitability (F2. = 5.137, p = 0.020, ? 2 = 0.059) and Responsiveness to training factors (Fdos. = 7.988, p = 0.003, ? 2 = 0.094). In the former (Activity/Excitability) factor, Hungarian Border collies received lower scores than GWL dogs (p = 0.020, d = 0.792) and tended to receive lower scores than Austrian Border collies (p = 0.066, d = 0.459). Subsequent analyses of the facets of this factor showed significant differences in Excitability and Playfulness between the samples. Regarding the Excitability facet (Fdos. = , p 2 = 0.104), Hungarian Border collies were found to be less excitable than both the GWL dogs (p 2 = 0.067), GWL dogs were more playful than both Hungarian (d = 1.006) and Austrian Border collies (d = 0.892, p 0.193 for both).
In the case of the Responsiveness to training factor, Austrian Border collies received lower scores than GWL dogs (p = 0.014, d = 0.829) and, on a trend level, also lower than Hungarian Border collies (p = 0.056, d = 0.419). Regarding the two facets of this factor, the results did not show a significant difference between the samples in Trainability (p = 0.193), only in Controllability (F2. = , p 2 = 0.129). In this facet, we found that Austrian Border collies received lower scores than both GWL dogs (p = 0.003, d = 0.965) and Hungarian Border collies (p = 0.006, d = 0.676) (Fig. 1c).
Discussion
Similar to people degree (Age.grams., Stankov 2018; Wirthwein ainsi que al. 2019), our very own exploratory research didn’t discover differences in very personality traits between the gifted while the regular pets. Truly the only feature you to exhibited a distinction ranging from GWL Border collies and you may both the Austrian and you will Hungarian samples of normal Border collies is actually Playfulness. Thus, because hypothesized, giftedness for the fixing a specific disease (accepting things based on verbal labels) can be on the large levels of playfulness.
Brand new quick learning out-of toy brands is shown to occur in playful personal contexts towards the manager (Fugazza mais aussi al. 2021a, b), that could next rather have studying within the extremely playful individuals by giving way more era getting studying. More playful animals was basically as well as discover to determine eye contact which have individuals shorter (Bognar 2021), which may further assists a verbal context, like the one in hence object labels was effortlessly read by GWL animals.